Sunday, August 12, 2012

And God said "Let thar be Klar", and thar was Klar

Clair is philosophically opposed to birthdays. One of those "age is just a number" people, only she doesn't just say it, she believes it. Last night at the restaurant when the clock struck midnight and I started blasting The Beatles' "Birthday" on my phone, she told me to turn it off.

However, since this opinionated sister of mine does not read this blog, I can say whatever I want. Clair, you're one of the best people ever invented and I'm proud to have you as my sister. I can't say anything more or I'll get all sappy and start rhyming things with things.

Below: Clair yesterday in the parking lot at Children of Eden. (Actually, it looks like she may have found Eden. In a parking lot. Cue "Big Yellow Taxi".)

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Coming Up Next

I just ventured to the cottage to get my long-forgotten copy of Perelandra, and I think my next two hours are booked. I must admit, the cover of Out of the Silent Planet isn't my favorite, but this one? Look at those colors. And the design. Just look at it.

Are those dragons? Are the forces of Satan about to close in on Malacandra? Wait, why am I typing? I should be reading.

Stay with me, folks.

"And the Lord God had planted a paradise of pleasure from the beginning..."

I've had the book of Genesis, specifically Eden, on the brain of late. My extremely talented sister Mary is currently playing Eve in Children of Eden, a musical so loosely based on Genesis it's maddening. I'd like to write a whole separate post dealing with that subject, but in the meantime, I'm really enjoying her run. She brings a wide-eyed childishness to Eve that's almost reminiscent of Wonderland's Alice, and, of course, her singing is beautiful.

It's funny how we, as a species, just can't seem to shake Eden. There's an aiming for Eden in everything we do, even in the books we write; fiction is overflowing with Edens. Who could forget Aslan singing Narnia into being in C.S. Lewis's The Magician's Nephew, or an entire celestial body in a state of grace in Out of the Silent Planet? But it's not only the religious authors--the more skeptical John Steinbeck moved the book of Genesis to the Salinas Valley in East of Eden, which he wholeheartedly regarded as the best of all his works. Samuel Taylor Coleridge set up his poem Kubla Khan as an intoxicating dream of a pleasure-garden, then snapped it forebodingly off just as the forbidden fruit is ingested: "For he on honeydew hath fed/And drunk the milk of paradise."

They're not all so serious. There are comedic Edens. Evelyn Waugh famously said of P.G. Wodehouse's Blandings Castle series, "The gardens of Blandings Castle are that original garden from which we are all exiled." Every single book sees numerous impostors infiltrating its delectable grounds and, of course, getting likened to serpents. (Just to top it all off, the love interest in the second book is named Eve.)

And wait a second, this very blog owes its name to an amusing Eden--the Forest of Arden in Shakespeare's As You Like It. Ironically, the only way to get there is by being exiled. A famous speech in the middle of it runs, "Here feel we but the penalty of Adam,/The season’s difference, as the icy fang/And churlish chiding of the winter’s wind..." But oddly enough, the version in the folio ran, "Here feel we not the penalty of Adam." Most likely a typo, but you never know.

I leave you with Hans Christian Andersen's take, The Garden of Paradise, the tale of a young man whose obsession with finding Eden becomes quite literal.

[Edit: Was just reminded that Nicole Baart, one of my favorite authors, has a novel called Sleeping in Eden slated for publication in April 2013! We don't know a thing about it yet...but we can wait.]

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Review: Something New by P.G. Wodehouse

1915 was a landmark year for P.G. Wodehouse. Already a experienced comedy writer for various magazines and journals, he published a short story called "Extricating Young Gussie" in the Saturday Evening Post, little knowing that its ditzy first-person narrator and his valet, Jeeves, would soon become his most recognizable characters. In a similarly unconscious way he let loose a serial called Something New; it wasn't until years later that he got the idea of giving it a sequel, and then another…and then another. In his own words, he developed a "Blandings Castle craving"; he was "down with a Saga, and no cure in sight."

Maybe it was Lord Emsworth that drew Wodehouse back to Blandings; he would later name Emsworth as his favorite among his own characters. Emsworth, it should be mentioned, is not a particularly funny character in and of himself; picture an elderly Bertie Wooster with Alzheimer's. He's out of touch with reality, utterly absorbed in a few quirky hobbies, and generally the subject of a string of gags about lethal forgetfulness. But if he doesn't have brains, he certainly has inner peace, and an author struggling to fill multiple deadlines might well find balm in writing about that amiable old homebody. (Although it was some time before Emsworth made another appearance, Wodehouse's fondness for him was evident in that he couldn't resist name-dropping him in a Jeeves and Wooster story one year later: "A most respectable old Johnnie, don't you know. Doesn't do a thing nowadays but dig in the garden with a spud.")

Or maybe the castle itself was attractive, for Emsworth is useful as a character precisely because he's useless as a landowner. He inhabits a gorgeous estate full of rambling gardens, weird nooks and priceless treasures, and though he loves it with all his soul and can't imagine being any place else, he's utterly unaware of what's happening in it at any given time. Thieves, detectives and (worse) young lovers are constantly snooping about the grounds in disguise, each with a complicated scheme in tow. Dumbledore always has an eagle-eyed watch over Hogwarts, but never acts on his knowledge because it would spoil the plot; Emsworth avoids plot holes by simply being as dense as a brick. His foil is The Efficient Baxter, the bespectacled and ever-suspicious secretary, who always gets hold of the truth but never succeeds in exposing it, nor in incriminating anyone involved.

Something New is a prototype in several senses. It's a prototype for the edited, "official" U.K. edition, Something Fresh, and it's a prototype for the Blandings series as a whole. Wodehouse wrote these things as serials for magazines and characters came second to plot; in his theatrical way he would map out a complicated comedy in his notebook, full of twists, coincidences and misunderstandings, referring to the protagonists simply as "hero" and "heroine". The only trait required for the roles is a breezy boldness; it's as if you could hold auditions and find someone to sing the parts.

In fact, this happens in-story when one Ashe Marson answers an irresistible advertisement: "WANTED: Young Man of good appearance, who is poor and reckless, to undertake a delicate and dangerous enterprise." That's really all that's wanted for a plot like this--good looks and recklessness. So Ashe, after a slapdash job interview, becomes the hero, the fellow to fill a hero's place in the plot from start to finish. The girl who goaded him to make "something new" of his life in the first place turns out to be on the same mission, and it's a mission of theft. Her name is technically Joan Valentine, but since she's blonde, blue-eyed and quite the feminist, she has "heroine" written all over her.

What follows might have been a blueprint for the more character-driven Leave it to Psmith. As "hero", Ashe isn't a distinctive comic creation, but in his music-hall manner he shows "some sparks that are like wit", and it's clear that he owes a bit to Psmith, who was already popular among English schoolboys. In the American edition an entire scene was stolen nearly word-for-word from a Psmith story with Ashe delivering his lines. It was edited out in the U.K. version because the English were already acquainted with Psmith, but although I wasn't familiar with Psmith myself when I read Something New, the scene felt wrong to me; it was out-of-character for Ashe to think so quickly (he being only the hero and not necessarily the invincible wonder; in this he perhaps owes more to Psmith's friend Mike Jackson).

What sort of stories Wodehouse served you depended on which side of the Atlantic you were on; the Psmith stories were for a British audience, and one novel even landed Psmith in America, proceeding to explain New York and its oddities for the benefit of the reader. Since Something New was written for an American audience, Ashe and Joan are American by birth, and the more-experienced Joan has to explain English etiquette to Ashe so he can survive below-stairs as he impersonates a valet. When the book was republished in England, Wodehouse made Ashe and Joan English and thus was able to cut several pages of dull exposition. He was a trans-atlantic interpreter of the most practical order.

Something New is far from a polished final product, but it marks an epoch in Wodehouse's career, and it also features one of his most beautifully-written romances. Ashe and Joan may not be distinctive as characters, but as vehicles for observations on love they manage, as per their intentions, to make something of themselves.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Graces

[Written last month, but never polished and never posted. The laptop is back now, although Clair is holding a monopoly on it, which is why I'm still using the Blogger iPhone app.]

"You say grace before meals. All right. But I say grace before the concert and the opera, and grace before the play and pantomime, and grace before I open a book, and grace before sketching, painting, swimming, fencing, boxing, walking, playing, dancing and grace before I dip the pen in the ink."
- G.K. Chesterton

This was going to be the summer I wrote a whole ton. (That matters little. Every summer was going to be the summer I wrote a whole ton. When will I learn that people simply don't write a whole ton in summer? That's the beauty of summer.)

The laptop broke in June, so I've got an excuse, anyway. Not sure when we'll be able to get it fixed. Everything's backed up, so that's okay, though. What I've mostly been doing is wandering in the yard, listening to music, reading books, and writing the occasional poem.

What I'm really doing is praying more. I'm always procrastinating when it comes to prayer. There's an odd tendency in me to put off the things I most need to do with the most vehemence--I feel guilty about putting them off, so I kind of just let them stew while I brood about not doing them. This isn't logical, but it's human. I do the same thing to my writing. Maybe I'm almost relieved to let the leaves grow over my laptop and swallow it up. (Figuratively, I mean. I keep it inside.)

Then I think of Chesterton's quote up there. It's one of my favorites, but I never remember it before I write. Saying a grace before writing might keep me on track. And now I think , maybe I should say a grace before prayers? A sort of grace before grace.

And if I said a grace before that, and a grace before that, and a grace before that...

And now I feel another quote coming on. The priest at my last confession said something that I think will always stick with me: "If you have gratitude, you have the spiritual life."

Life should be less about setting time aside to do things separately and more about a series of graces, one after the next.

Monday, August 6, 2012

Where's my Wimsey?

I ordered my used copy of Dorothy L. Sayer's Strong Poison in June, and it still hasn't come. Amazon says it should have come to me in July, which it didn't.

And to add insult to injury, all the Wimsey books are finally available as Kindle editions now. Every blessed one of them. So I could get Strong Poison right this second for ten dollars, but I already spent money on the other one.

Better, I guess, to sit around and sulk, and read alternative books about impossibly cool English gentleman to fill the gap. Right now I've got Bulldog Drummond, a thriller that was popular enough in its day to get parodied in P.G. Wodehouse's Leave it to Psmith, and The Amateur Cracksman, a short story collection about master thief A.J. Raffles and his accomplice, going at once. It's not the same, but it's something.

Drummond is really entertaining in a fast-paced, humorous kind of way. Cracksman is well-written, but something of a disappointment thus far. I picked it up because I'd heard the concept was "Holmes and Watson robbing houses", and that's exactly what it is, but once you've said that about it you've said it all; it barely departs a single jot from that basic idea. It's also less intricate than Holmes out of necessity, because swiping things is simpler than figuring out how they were swiped, but I can see where the concept has potential. To quote G.K. Chesterton, "The criminal is the creative artist; the detective only the critic."

Remind me to make the acquaintance of one Artemis Fowl, too. All the kids in the Shakespeare group I direct are after me to read him.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

The Sons of Such Tears

Several years ago I read St. Augustine's Confessions. It was a difficult book for me to read--not because it was badly-written or slow-paced, but because I honestly struggle with feeling guilty over the slightest things. St. Augustine was a philosopher as well as a penitent, and in Confessions he analyzes the specific wrongnesses of even his earliest sins, slight sins such as infantile jealousy and stealing apples from neighboring orchards. Suddenly every crime of mine seemed to loom large.

But I finished it and I'm glad I did, because the book was very well worth reading. It was only today that I realized just how worth reading it was. All apple orchards aside, what, exactly, where Augustine's sins? What were the things that kept his mother, St. Monica, awake at night?

In the modern eye, not much. He lived with a woman who wasn't his wife, but he was never unfaithful to her. He disbelieved the Bible and sought out strange superstitions, but nothing odder than your average horoscope. He stayed up nights carousing, but he wasn't a mindless drunk; he was a learned man, a teacher, soft and stern and (probably) clean-shaven. He goes on for page after wretched page about how much he regrets the nights he spent at the theater. The reader might scoff at this, until he catches the footnote explaining that theater in Augustine's time was often centered around onstage sex. And even then the reader might scoff. Okay, so St. Augustine watched pornography. Why not? Lots of young men watch pornography. They're even told, and constantly, that it's healthy. In fact, at this point Augustine's life is starting to look like the PC ideal. He's a boy scout.

What makes St. Augustine any different from the skeptical, intelligent, partygoing, cohabiting, occasionally pornography-watching nice guy of today?

There was one major difference. St. Augustine had a mother who didn't hold with all of that.

His father didn't mind it. He was open-minded. He was a pagan himself, and he was proud of his son. He couldn't wait to have grandchildren; he didn't care if the mother was married to his son or not. But to St. Monica, it mattered. She went around to all the churches; she prayed as hard as she could. She loved that son of hers, and not just because he had a nice smile or because everyone praised his writing; she loved him so much that she was willing to do anything to bring him back to God. One priest, wearying of her pleading and crying, told her, "Go away from me now. As you live, it is impossible that the son of such tears should perish." She took his words as a sign.

"As you live, it is impossible that the son of such tears should perish." There are boys today who go astray, good boys whose mothers care about them and love them. Are any of them the sons of tears?

We have hope, because I think that they are. If anything gets to Jesus--and everything gets to Jesus--it is the tears of a mother for her son. What mother ever shed more tears than Mary?

The fatherless boys, the motherless boys, the boys with no one to pray for them, have something on their side, even if they don't know it. As long as we have Mary, we have a mother who pleads relentlessly, unceasingly, for her sons to come home.

And as long as we have faith in God's infinite mercy and love, it is impossible that they should perish.